Skip to main content

Ethical Decision-Making and Interpretations in Organizational Behavior”

The story of Lord Ram and his brother Bharat offers profound insights into the concepts of aspect and interpretation, especially within the realm of organizational behavior. Their responses to Kaikeyi’s wishes illustrate how different interpretations of the same situation can lead to diverse paths while adhering to the principles of dharma. This analysis can be beneficial for understanding decision-making processes, leadership styles, and ethical dilemmas in organizations.


Ram’s Perspective: Embracing Maryada


When Kaikeyi, influenced by her desires and fears, demanded that Ram be exiled for 14 years and Bharat be crowned king, Ram exemplified the ideals of maryada (righteousness and respectability). He interpreted Kaikeyi’s wishes as a duty to uphold his father’s honour and the sanctity of his father’s word. Rather than resisting or questioning this unjust demand, Ram accepted his fate with grace and composure.


Ram’s response highlights a key principle in organizational behavior: the importance of emotional intelligence in leadership. By prioritising the greater good and maintaining harmony in the kingdom, Ram showcased selflessness and integrity. His decision to accept exile was not viewed as a personal loss but as an opportunity to demonstrate commitment to ethical principles. This aspect of his character emphasizes the value of servant leadership, where a leader’s primary focus is on serving others and fostering a collaborative environment.


In organisations , leaders like Ram can create a culture of trust and respect by embodying ethical standards, thereby motivating their teams to adopt similar values. Ram’s adherence to dharma serves as a reminder that decisions should be made with a sense of responsibility and consideration for the collective well-being.


Bharat’s Perspective: Upholding Dharma through Rebellion


In contrast, Bharat’s reaction to Kaikeyi’s demands was one of vehement opposition. Upon learning about his mother’s machinations, Bharat felt a deep sense of anger and betrayal. He viewed her wish not just as an act of treachery against Ram, but as a violation of their core values. Bharat’s interpretation led him to reject the throne and the power unjustly bestowed upon him. Instead, he sought to bring Ram back from exile, understanding that true kingship involves serving the people with love and respect.


Bharat’s actions reflect a critical aspect of organizational behavior: the necessity of ethical dissent. His decision to place Ram’s sandals on the throne and rule in his name was a powerful statement of his devotion and commitment to dharma. By disobeying Kaikeyi’s wishes, Bharat demonstrated that upholding righteousness sometimes requires challenging unjust authority.


This aspect of Bharat’s character emphasizes the importance of moral courage in the workplace. Employees and leaders alike may encounter situations where they must stand up against unethical practices or decisions, even if it means going against higher authority. Bharat’s example teaches that loyalty to ethical principles and genuine relationships can sometimes necessitate conflict with established power dynamics.


Commonality: Adherence to Dharma


Despite their contrasting approaches, both Ram and Bharat adhered to dharma, albeit through different interpretations. Ram’s path was characterised by loyalty and respect toward his father and the kingdom, while Bharat’s path was defined by love and loyalty toward his brother and the true essence of kingship.


Their story teaches us that the essence of dharma lies not merely in following orders or rules but in understanding the deeper implications of our actions. In organizational settings, this translates to recognizing that the same situation can be perceived in multiple ways, and our interpretations and responses define our character and effectiveness as leaders.


In real life, we often face dilemmas where the right path is not always evident. Ram and Bharat exemplify how different aspects of the same principle can lead to varied interpretations and responses. Ultimately, both paths led to the greater good, showcasing that in the realm of dharma, the intent behind actions is what truly matters.

The tale of Ram and Bharat serves as a timeless reminder of the significance of aspect and interpretation in our choices. It illustrates that while our paths may differ, our commitment to dharma can guide us toward righteousness. Their lives reflect the complexity of moral choices, encouraging us to think deeply about our interpretations and the principles we uphold.


In the realm of organisational behaviour, this story inspires leaders and employees to navigate their paths with integrity, compassion, and a profound understanding of ethical considerations. By drawing from the examples of Ram and Bharat, we can strive to cultivate environments where ethical decision-making flourishes, fostering a culture that values both righteousness and respect.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Middle Management Falling in the trap of Lakshman Syndrome

What is Lakshman Syndrome? In the Ramayana, Lakshman is considered a divine figure, often associated with Shesh Nag, the cosmic serpent that bears the weight of the world. Shesh Nag is believed to support the earth and heavens, symbolizing strength and endurance. Lakshman embodies this ideal, bearing the emotional, physical, and moral weight of his responsibilities. His unwavering dedication and sacrifices mirror the cosmic duty of Shesh Nag, making him a symbol of selfless support and protection.  For 14 years, he forsook sleep, family, and comfort to serve Lord Ram and Sita. While his selflessness is commendable, it also highlights the dangers of prioritising duty over personal well-being. In the corporate world, middle managers often find themselves in a similar position, shouldering the weight of organisational expectations, decisions, and challenges. Like Lakshman, they quietly take on burdens to ensure stability, often sacrificing their own well-being in the process.  A...

Every Organization Has a Banarakas

In the fourth season of the show Panchayat, a surprising yet insightful leadership moment unfolds — Pradhan Ji, a grounded and efficient village head, loses the local election. He had everything a good leader should: integrity, dedication, and visible results. Yet he is defeated by Banarakas, a man who built his entire campaign on mockery, accusations, and theatrical disruption. The defeat wasn’t just political — it was a reflection of what happens when a leader loses focus and gets pulled into the irrelevant debate. Management Lessons From Panchayat  Banarakas was not a real competitor until he was made into one. His strength didn’t lie in strategy, governance, or public service — it lay in provocation. The moment Pradhan Ji’s team responded him and Manju Devi publicly argued with Kranti Devi — Banarakas became more than background noise. He became the narrative. Not because he earned it, but because he was handed the mic. Banrakas in every Organisation  This isn’t just the...

Have the Courage to Stand Alone- Story of Yuyutsu

In every organisation, there are moments when individuals must choose between conformity with the group and standing up for what is right. The story of Yuyutsu, the lone Kaurava who sided with the Pandavas in the Mahabharata, offers timeless lessons on courage, moral clarity, and leadership in the workplace. The Context of Courage Yuyutsu was the son of Dhitrastra and maid of Gandhari named Sugandha. He was  born into Kauravas cam, yet he chose to oppose his brother Duryodhan during the Kurukshetra war because he believed in dharma, or righteousness. His decision was neither easy nor popular it meant facing ridicule, accusations of betrayal, and alienation from his family. Yet, Yuyutsu stood firm because he understood a fundamental truth that true loyalty lies in upholding principles, not blind allegiance to Kaurava.  Duryodhan’s team had many stalwarts like Bhishma, Dronacharya, Karna, Kripacharya, and Ashwatthama, who were renowned warriors and scholars. However, none of the...