Skip to main content

Fear Based Leadership Fails in Long Run

In the corporate world, particularly in public sector banks or large organizations, leadership styles greatly influence the work culture and the long-term success of the team. “Danda Sanskriti”  or the culture of ruling through fear  may yield immediate results, but it rarely leads to sustainable success. True leadership is built on trust, respect, and character, as exemplified by Lord Ram’s style of leadership, contrasting sharply with Ravana’s rule by fear.


Fear-Based Leadership: The Ravana Approach:

Ravana, the mighty king of Lanka, ruled through fear, intimidation, and control. His leadership style was defined by power and coercion, and while it ensured compliance, it never earned him the loyalty or respect of his people. Those who worked under him followed his commands out of fear of retribution rather than genuine dedication or belief in his vision.


In many organizations, especially those operating within rigid, hierarchical structures, leaders often resort to fear-based tactics to maintain control. This “Danda Sanskriti” might result in short-term efficiency, but it fosters a toxic work environment where employees feel disengaged, undervalued, and anxious. The creativity and innovation that thrive in a positive, trust-filled environment are stifled, leaving only mediocrity in their place.


Studies and real-world examples have repeatedly shown that fear-driven workplaces lead to low morale, high employee turnover, decreased productivity, and an overall sense of dissatisfaction. People are more likely to do the bare minimum to avoid punishment rather than going above and beyond in their roles.


Trust-Based Leadership: The Lord Ram Approach:

In contrast, Lord Ram’s leadership was built on trust, respect, and the deep-rooted principles of dharma. Ram’s rule was not about instilling fear in the hearts of his people but about empowering them to act in alignment with righteousness and virtue. He led by example, showing that true strength lies in character, compassion, and respect for others.


In organizational terms, Ram’s leadership reflects transformational leadership, where the focus is on inspiring and motivating employees to take ownership of their work. Leaders like Ram understand that trust is the foundation of any successful team. They lead by earning respect through fairness, consistency, and integrity. When employees feel valued and trusted, they are far more likely to perform at their best, offering creativity, innovation, and loyalty in return.


This is the kind of leadership that creates a sustainable, thriving organization. Employees in such environments are motivated not by fear but by a shared vision and mutual respect. They feel a sense of ownership and commitment to their work, leading to higher job satisfaction and better performance.


Why Fear-Based Leadership Fails in the Long Run


While fear might yield quick, visible results, it often leads to a toxic work culture that erodes employee morale over time. When leaders rely on fear, they cultivate an environment where:

1. Creativity is suppressed: Employees fear failure or punishment, so they refrain from taking risks or thinking outside the box.
2. Communication breaks down: Fear leads to mistrust, and employees may hesitate to communicate openly, fearing reprisal for honest feedback or criticism.
3. Employee turnover increases: Talented employees are likely to leave, seeking better opportunities in more positive work environments.
4. Teamwork suffers: In a fear-based culture, employees may compete against each other to avoid being reprimanded, undermining collaboration.

Public sector banks and other large organisations that adopt this “Danda Sanskriti” often see stagnation in their growth and productivity. The lack of motivation, innovation, and genuine engagement limits their potential, even though the immediate results may appear satisfactory.

The Importance of Character in Leadership:


Leaders like Lord Ram had a deep-rooted sense of character, which made them trustworthy and respected. Ram did not need to use fear to enforce his rule because his people believed in his vision and integrity. Similarly, in organizations today, leaders who have a strong moral compass, who operate with transparency and fairness, are the ones who inspire loyalty and dedication from their teams.


When leaders operate from a place of character, they create a culture where employees feel safe to express themselves, where they are motivated to go beyond their duties, and where the collective success of the organization becomes everyone’s goal.


This is why leadership based on fear is unsustainable. Without character, leadership is hollow, and eventually, the cracks will show. Ravana’s downfall was inevitable because his kingdom was built on fear. In contrast, Ram’s leadership endured through respect and trust, values that resonate even today.

True leadership cannot be built on fear. While fear-based strategies may deliver short-term results, they are unsustainable and lead to a toxic work environment where employees are uninspired and disengaged. On the other hand, leadership rooted in trust, respect, and character fosters loyalty, creativity, and long-term success.

Public sector banks and other organisations must move away from the outdated “Danda Sanskriti” and embrace the leadership style of Lord Ram—where trust replaces fear, and integrity defines authority. By doing so, they can create work cultures that not only thrive in the present but also build a foundation for sustained success in the future.


Final Thought:

Just as Lord Ram’s leadership endured because it was based on character and righteousness, organizations today must cultivate leaders who embody those same values, creating environments where employees are motivated to achieve their full potential, not out of fear, but out of shared purpose and respect.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Middle Management Falling in the trap of Lakshman Syndrome

What is Lakshman Syndrome? In the Ramayana, Lakshman is considered a divine figure, often associated with Shesh Nag, the cosmic serpent that bears the weight of the world. Shesh Nag is believed to support the earth and heavens, symbolizing strength and endurance. Lakshman embodies this ideal, bearing the emotional, physical, and moral weight of his responsibilities. His unwavering dedication and sacrifices mirror the cosmic duty of Shesh Nag, making him a symbol of selfless support and protection.  For 14 years, he forsook sleep, family, and comfort to serve Lord Ram and Sita. While his selflessness is commendable, it also highlights the dangers of prioritising duty over personal well-being. In the corporate world, middle managers often find themselves in a similar position, shouldering the weight of organisational expectations, decisions, and challenges. Like Lakshman, they quietly take on burdens to ensure stability, often sacrificing their own well-being in the process.  A...

Every Organization Has a Banarakas

In the fourth season of the show Panchayat, a surprising yet insightful leadership moment unfolds — Pradhan Ji, a grounded and efficient village head, loses the local election. He had everything a good leader should: integrity, dedication, and visible results. Yet he is defeated by Banarakas, a man who built his entire campaign on mockery, accusations, and theatrical disruption. The defeat wasn’t just political — it was a reflection of what happens when a leader loses focus and gets pulled into the irrelevant debate. Management Lessons From Panchayat  Banarakas was not a real competitor until he was made into one. His strength didn’t lie in strategy, governance, or public service — it lay in provocation. The moment Pradhan Ji’s team responded him and Manju Devi publicly argued with Kranti Devi — Banarakas became more than background noise. He became the narrative. Not because he earned it, but because he was handed the mic. Banrakas in every Organisation  This isn’t just the...

Have the Courage to Stand Alone- Story of Yuyutsu

In every organisation, there are moments when individuals must choose between conformity with the group and standing up for what is right. The story of Yuyutsu, the lone Kaurava who sided with the Pandavas in the Mahabharata, offers timeless lessons on courage, moral clarity, and leadership in the workplace. The Context of Courage Yuyutsu was the son of Dhitrastra and maid of Gandhari named Sugandha. He was  born into Kauravas cam, yet he chose to oppose his brother Duryodhan during the Kurukshetra war because he believed in dharma, or righteousness. His decision was neither easy nor popular it meant facing ridicule, accusations of betrayal, and alienation from his family. Yet, Yuyutsu stood firm because he understood a fundamental truth that true loyalty lies in upholding principles, not blind allegiance to Kaurava.  Duryodhan’s team had many stalwarts like Bhishma, Dronacharya, Karna, Kripacharya, and Ashwatthama, who were renowned warriors and scholars. However, none of the...